Politics

We The People Do Not Elect Our President: How AIPAC Controls U.S. Presidential Outcomes

Wisdom

08 Aug 2024 • 4 min read

AI Assisted Image of a Jewish Rabbi using Uncle Sam as a marionette puppet.

In the modern political landscape, social media has become the battleground for winning hearts and minds. Every post, tweet, and share influences the popular vote, creating an illusion of democratic participation. Yet, this surge of digital democracy masks a stark reality: the popular vote has no bearing on the outcome of who becomes president. Instead, the true power lies in the shadows of political manipulation, orchestrated by entities like AIPAC, that shape gerrymandering and control the seats that ultimately decide the presidency.

Social Media: A Mirage of Influence

Social media platforms are hailed as tools of empowerment, allowing citizens to voice their opinions and influence political outcomes. However, despite the fervent activity on these platforms, the popular vote remains merely a symbolic gesture. The U.S. presidential election hinges on the Electoral College, an institution that disregards the popular vote in favor of a state-by-state battle for electoral votes. This system renders the popular vote inconsequential, turning social media-driven popular sentiment into a powerless echo.

The Subversion of Democracy

The Electoral College and gerrymandering have fundamentally subverted the idea of democracy in America. By manipulating electoral district boundaries to favor certain political outcomes, gerrymandering ensures that the distribution of power is skewed long before any votes are cast. The Electoral College further distorts this power, making it possible for a candidate to lose the popular vote yet win the presidency. This system creates an illusion that voting matters, while in reality, the outcome is often predetermined by strategic political maneuvers.

The Real Puppet Masters: AIPAC and Gerrymandering

Behind the scenes, powerful lobbying groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) exert immense influence over American politics. AIPAC's strategic manipulation of gerrymandering—the practice of redrawing electoral districts to favor a particular party—has a profound impact on the composition of Congress and, by extension, the Electoral College. By securing favorable congressional seats, AIPAC ensures that the political landscape tilts in favor of candidates aligned with its interests.

Donald Trump: An Asset for Israel

AIPAC's influence becomes even more significant when considering the geopolitical stakes for Israel. Donald Trump, perceived by many as an Israeli asset, has demonstrated unwavering support for Israeli policies. Under his administration, U.S.-Israel relations reached unprecedented heights, including the controversial recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital . For Israel, Trump's presidency represented a strategic boon, aligning American foreign policy with its own objectives.

The Desperation of a Nation

Facing a complex and volatile geopolitical situation, Israel views the potential election of another Democratic president with trepidation. Democratic administrations often adopt a more balanced approach to Middle East policy, which can conflict with Israeli interests. Israel's survival instincts, driven by regional threats and internal pressures, make the prospect of a Trump presidency not just desirable but essential.

AIPAC's Strategic Playbook

In this high-stakes game, AIPAC is poised to leverage its considerable influence to ensure Trump's return to power. Through meticulous gerrymandering efforts and strategic financial support, AIPAC can shape the electoral map to favor Republican candidates . By doing so, AIPAC aims to secure a pro-Israel majority in Congress, which in turn strengthens the Republican hold on the Electoral College.

How AIPAC Influences Gerrymandering

Financial Contributions: AIPAC directs substantial financial contributions to political candidates who support its agenda. By funding candidates favorable to their interests, AIPAC helps ensure those candidates win elections and influence the redistricting process.

Political Support and Endorsements: AIPAC provides political support and endorsements to candidates who align with its goals. This can increase the chances of those candidates winning elections and gaining positions where they can influence redistricting decisions.

Lobbying Efforts: AIPAC engages in extensive lobbying efforts, not just at the federal level but also at the state level where redistricting decisions are made. By lobbying state legislators, AIPAC can push for redistricting plans that favor candidates who support their positions.

Grassroots Mobilization: AIPAC can mobilize its extensive network of supporters to advocate for redistricting plans that benefit pro-Israel candidates. This grassroots effort can influence public opinion and put pressure on legislators to adopt favorable redistricting maps.

Strategic Alliances: AIPAC often forms alliances with other powerful lobbying groups and political organizations. By working together, they can pool resources and influence to impact the redistricting process in ways that favor their collective interests.

Data and Analytics: AIPAC leverages data and analytics to identify key districts where redistricting could have the most significant impact. By targeting these districts, AIPAC can strategically influence the redistricting process to create more favorable electoral outcomes.

The Illusion of Impartiality

AIPAC's contributions to Democratic candidates often serve as a strategic ploy to create an illusion of impartiality. By appearing to support both sides of the political spectrum, AIPAC maintains an image of being an unbiased investor in the American political system. However, the reality is that these contributions are part of a calculated effort to ensure that pro-Israel policies are upheld regardless of which party is in power.

The Inevitable Outcome

While social media buzzes with debates and predictions, the true determinants of the presidential election operate in the background. AIPAC's manipulation of gerrymandering and congressional seats creates a predetermined path to the White House. The popular vote, swayed by social media, becomes a sideshow in this orchestrated play. Rallies, campaigns, and social media influence are rendered pointless because the outcome is predetermined by political action committees, AIPAC, and foreign influence. The American people do not select their president; instead, the presidency is shaped by strategic political actors and powerful interests.

As the 2024 election approaches, it becomes clear that the digital cacophony of social media cannot compete with the silent, strategic moves of powerful lobbying groups. The invisible hand of AIPAC, guided by Israel's desperate geopolitical calculus, will do everything in its power to reestablish Donald Trump as president. In this intricate dance of influence, the future of American democracy and Middle Eastern geopolitics hangs in the balance, predetermined by forces far beyond the reach of the popular vote.

We The People Do Not Elect Our President: How AIPAC Controls U.S. Presidential Outcomes

Wisdom

How AIPAC Influences Gerrymandering

References

Sign up for more like this.